Ocean Equity Research

Marine Conservation

Marine Conservation

The health of the ocean is vital for the functioning of the planet and humans have used the ocean and its resources for centuries for navigation, trade and food security. Overexploitation and pollution put marine ecosystems at risk and marine conservation seeks to counter environmental threats, caused by human activities. Marine conservation takes many forms, including the establishment of marine protected areas and other area-based management tools to restrict or prohibit certain harmful activities.

Our Ocean Equity Research program supports marine conservation efforts to support planetary health objectives, while considering historic responsibility for environmental harm by acknowledging differentiated responsibility and avoiding placing a disproportionate burden on developing states. Ocean equity requires a diversity of views and the inclusion of different stakeholders in intergovernmental policy, such as integration of Indigenous worldviews and marginalised actors in decision-making. Ocean equity concerns questions on who can take decisions over what, how much of the common resources can be sustainably used and what should be protected, how our relationship to the ocean is understood and on what grounds nature is valued. While an anthropogenic view – namely valuing the ocean for its benefit to humans – is dominating today’s narratives, ocean governance could be re-imagined through an eco-centric lens. By recognising the value of nature beyond its benefits to humans, acknowledging intrinsic value and rights of the ocean and marine species can encourage a healthier human-nature relationship and safeguard benefits for future generations and planetary health.

Recent Publications

Fact or fiction? Unpacking the terminologies used in fisheries allocation discussions

In this paper, authors analysed the conservation and management measures of RFMOs that include exemptions from catch, effort and capacity limits and found that they are used most commonly in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. They argue that the use of exemptions due to the failure of RFMOs to adopt equitable allocation frameworks has the potential to negatively impact marine resources and their development opportunities. Instead, alternatives, such as equitable allocations of science-based catch and effort limits, transferability and phased adjustments, should be developed.

Read More »

The Unintended Consequences of Exemptions in Conservation and Management Measures for Fisheries Management

In this paper, authors analysed the conservation and management measures of RFMOs that include exemptions from catch, effort and capacity limits and found that they are used most commonly in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. They argue that the use of exemptions due to the failure of RFMOs to adopt equitable allocation frameworks has the potential to negatively impact marine resources and their development opportunities. Instead, alternatives, such as equitable allocations of science-based catch and effort limits, transferability and phased adjustments, should be developed.

Read More »

David against Goliath? The rise of coastal states at the Indian Ocean Tuna commission

Tuna regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) have long suffered from the domination of distant water fishing nations (DWFNs) in decision-making processes. The Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) is no exception. In recent years, coastal states of the Indian Ocean (IO) have tried to change this dynamic – led by countries like the Maldives, Kenya, South Africa, and Australia – to deliver greater benefits to the region, including East Africa.

Read More »